The entire transgender/transsexual push for rights is truly based on men’s rights to do as they please. Frankly, someone with female anatomy might have trouble using a urinal, and will probably just use a stall; a man with or without male equipment is not so encumbered in the ladies’ room.
The fact that any male can declare themselves female for the purpose of invading a bathroom to gawk , or even abuse women and children, does not seem to matter. (Yes, it has happened. And will continue to happen unless we aggressively prosecute any person using such a ploy to commit criminal acts.) How can you claim to be a woman with womanly feelings and not care about the safety of children? How can six year olds in a daycare/school be forced to deal with a child who is a girl one day and presented as a boy and with a new name the next? A child who happens to have 2 male parents. I guess that makes bringing legal action harder. Cannot question the new saints of liberal belief. I also find it laughable that multiple gay couples raising opposite sex children find out they are transgendered. And no one questions this. They are irrevocably harming their children, and no one cares. How can girls in a high school be forced to witness naked male organs, something we teach them almost from birth to avoid? And, if reports are true, to have the person connected to those organs sexually harass them? Why would any parent think such aggressive and illegal behavior does not deserve school expulsion at the very least? And move to correct that child? How can they condone raising a nasty and bullying child? But the school system bows down..rather than deal with legal wrangling. Well I have an answer for the school situation; if possible, change schools. Or homeschool. If enough of us leave the public school system maybe it will make a difference. Anyone with common sense will realize public school has outlived its usefulness. It is for indoctrination, not teaching of basic skills. And that is not new. It is not because of transgendered students; this is just one of the fruits of our experiment of ensuring every citizen can read and write, and therefore understand their rights and responsibilities; and along the way, inculcating what the government thinks they should believe as citizens, regardless of how a parent is raising them.. I am not sure any attempt to teach civics or English is occurring with our newest immigrants, be they middle eastern or from Spanish speaking countries.Without a common language and an understanding of basic law, we are at a total loss with integrating immigrants; we face more problems, more violence, than if we as a people could understand each other. It does not take condemning religious belief, it takes building a common understanding on the civil/government level. Be that as it may, we are right on track to submitting to a “common core” of belief and governmental regulation of everything from what you eat to how you conduct business. It is the bringing down of trade barriers, including immigration to fulfill labor needs, the centralization of money in electronic-only transactions, health care as determined by government officials. This has happened before. You know the names. Babylon, Greece, Rome. As oppressive as huge governments have been in the past, we as a group seem to yearn for total control again.( I subscribe to the 100th monkey theory, that once something becomes known/believed by a certain number of people, it seems to morph into a culture wide, even worldwide, belief.) As such, we should see some of the same personality types emerge as they always have. Dictatorial leaders (we have never lost those; Hitler, Mussolini, Saddam Hussein, communist ruled Russia and China, etc. are modern examples), a belief that one group or another is more evolved or worthy than any other group (there is currently a media war to see which worldview will win, LGBT or Islam) and advisers that pander to the leader’s every whim. The suffering or poverty of the actual living breathing people in such a government does not matter..as long as enough food and wealth and power accrue to the leaders, and their chosen favored groups. This was the purpose of Darwinism, by the way, to prove that (European males) were, by virtue of strength and the ability to dominate others, worthy of dominating others. Evolution you know. All of the science that flows from this premise is skewed in favor of struggle vs cooperation. Anything outside that thought is anathema and its proponents are enemies. It is not how humans have to live. Enter the advisers. One type often favored around the world was the eunuch. The eunuch, by virtue of being sterile (no children to promote; no chance of a kingly dynasty) was one common type. We know the Egyptians (Potiphar,) Babylonians (the fact that Daniel and his friends were raised in the house of Eunuchs suggests they were probably eunuchs) the male partners of one Caesar who were made eunuchs to better fit in their dresses, the castrati of the Catholic church , castrated to preserve their youthful voices, that there were Chinese eunuchs as well. Some religious sects apparently required castration to serve the God or Goddess. Judaism requited a male to be intact in his “stones” to serve as a priest and Jesus and Paul both discuss forms of eunuchs.. manmade ,born as such, or as a gift of the Holy Spirit. One horrific modern form exists. Female circumcision in effect removes sexual desire. As such, treated females are thought to be good and faithful wives, thus preserving social order. The idea of women being free moral agents has never occurred to the cultures where this is practiced. Males losing sexual organs (though modern science attempts to preserve sexual feeling) are in effect, eunuchs. It should be obvious that, if not done for the whims of kings, it is done to make them acceptable sex objects…for men. The benefits for such a male can be many, though at present they are presented as “victims.” They have had special status in the past, and have special status now. They are applauded and lauded as better than “real” females. And this time around, it is not imposed by the will of government, it is a sought out and desired status. This is the strongest proof yet that modern America is in fact, a pagan or heathen country. We ascribe to sexual anarchy and for providing men with any type of sexual partner they might wish at any time. Such practices were often part of religious duty in the pagan worlds of the past. I would offer that, if not fully in place, such religious connections will be made in the future. What this does is limit a woman to a house keeping or child bearing second class citizenship; only marriage and fidelity raise her to the status of partner. Given the overtly selfish nature of man on sexual conquest, it would follow that destroying children that are not desired (worship of Molech and Chemosh and possibly Ba’al) would become, and indeed is called, by liberals and feminists, a sacrament. Protection and nurture of children becomes nearly impossible in such a social structure. God spare our babies from the horrors that are coming, have already happened within some groups such as Isis. Is it time to drop the fake labels ascribed and call these men what they are? Maybe, as eunuch does imply a wounding, a loss, that transsexual does not. |
Faith and ReasonA grandma's perspective on a few things.. Archives
May 2020
Categories<a href="http://www.ontoplist.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.ontoplist.com/images/ontoplist50.png?id=553a2c21e7ccf" alt="Blog Directory & Business Pages - OnToplist.com" border="0"></a>
|